Showing posts with label Ron Hayter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ron Hayter. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

Hayter, Others, to Run

Ron Hayter announced today that he will be seeking an eleventh term on city council. Most people should view this as good news. Hayter's difficult to pigeonhole: a fiscal hawk (vying with Karen Liebovici for second biggest such hawk after Mike Nickel), a proponent of rapid LRT extension, and experienced without being a spent force. Hayter claims on his website that the federal Liberals, Conservatives, and Canadian Alliance have all approached him to run as a candidate, which shows that he's not sitting in the pocket of a political party. The voters of ward 2 will almost certainly re-elect him, and that's likely a positive thing for the city - whatever quarrels you might have with him, and however little you might want to see a council composed of thirteen Ron Hayters, there's certainly room for one.

The Journal and the Sun are both reporting that Liebovici, Linda Sloan, Kim Krushell, Ed Gibbons, Jane Batty, and Dave Thiele are all also running for re-election. This strikes us as a little odd, since Krushell (to take one example) told us just last week that she'd be making her announcement in June or July. But absent any denial from any of these councillors, we'll be taking this at face value.

Update: Here is the text of Hayter's remarks.

Tuesday, May 22, 2007

Idle Cars Are Council's Work - or Are They?

By now, everybody knows that Michael Phair's proposed anti-idling bylaw was defeated in a tie vote at the City's Transportation and Public Works Committee, with Phair and Janice Melnychuk in favour and Mike Nickel and Ron Hayter opposed. What's getting considerably less press is the fact that the motion was moved in two parts, divided, and dispensed with separately - a clause calling on the city administration to bring an proposed information campaign (and potential partners for the campaign) to the committee was carried by a three to one vote, with Hayter joining Phair and Melnychuk voting in favour.

This exposes the differences in Hayter's and Nickel's rationales for opposing the bylaw. Hayter felt that it was largely unenforceable (an allegation that was more or less conceded by the bylaw's proponents), but was fine with an information campaign, while Nickel felt that the whole thing was an unwarranted intrusion on Edmontonians' freedom of choice. Essentially, he argued that it wasn't Council's place to moralize, at least on this issue.

For that matter, even if there's a place for the state to engage in this sort of public awareness/advocacy, why is it the municipal level that should foot the bill? It seems to us that the Kyoto Accord was signed by a different level.

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

Cavanagh retires

The big news on the municipal front today is that Terry Cavanagh is retiring at the end of his term, after twenty-seven years on City Council (including two brief stints as mayor). Cavanagh joins long-time colleague Michael Phair in declining to seek an umpteenth term. With Bryan Anderson and Mike Nickel (and Stephen Mandel) having made their decisions to seek re-election public, this leaves eight Councillors who are not yet on the record about their intentions.

In Ward 1, neither Councillor has given any indication either way, but both are likely to seek re-election.

In Ward 2, Kim Krushell seems almost certain to run again, despite unfounded rumours that she may seek the provincial nomination for the Progressive Conservative Party in Edmonton Strathcona (why would she do a thing like that in a riding in which the P.C.s finished with less than a third of the votes that the N.D.P. got in 2004?). Ron Hayter's a little iffier - he retired from City Council once before, and has been back for six years.

In Ward 3, Janice Melnychuk is expected to forego a re-election bid in favour of seeking provincial office, as NDP candidate for Edmonton Manning. No word yet on Ed Gibbons.

In Ward 4, Jane Batty is expected to seek re-election, having commented late last month that she was "leaning in that direction".

In Ward 6, Dave Thiele hasn't yet announced his intentions. He was courted to run for the NDP federally in Edmonton Millwoods Beaumont in 2006, and declined, but was it because he wanted to stick with municipal politics or for some other reason?